Occasionally I book up for something simply because it looks interesting and it is easy to get to – probably the only two criteria for me for a visit. So it was that I found myself in Oxford, close and cheap to visit from Reading by train, to visit the “Labyrinth: Knossos Myth & Reality” exhibition at the Ashmolean.
The headline teaser for the exhibition was as follows and I went pretty much solely on this and the recommendation of Stephen Fry who was quoted on the website saying how wonderful it was.
If you are sensing a but coming you would be right. Almost the moment that I stepped into the exhibition space I knew that I was out of my depth and my lack of a classical education had been exposed. While the exhibits were interesting and engaging there seemed to be an implicit understanding that you intimately knew the story on which this was based. I did not and this meant that I felt I wasn’t able to get the most from it. If anything all it served to do was suggest that I really ought to buy (and read) Stephen Fry’s Greek Myths series.
It wasn’t just the exhibition subject that left me at a loss but also some of what was written on the explanation cards next to objects – what was this CE and BCE that they referred to? I should have been able to guess of course but a quick search revealed that it was the secular form of BC/AD which made perfect sense but it was the first time that I had encountered it.
I came away feeling not quite that I was stupid but maybe that my education had been somewhat remiss. Although, in my and the education system’s defence, CE/BCE weren’t introduced into schools until c. 2018 CE and maybe my school concentrated on English rather than the classics but my hopeless spelling suggests not!